The Muslim World Still lacks its commitment to Justice

Rohingyas in Myanmar and atheists believe Islam and Muslims impede liberalism and modernism.

Even the Muslim world is shy of extending support to the beleaguered Muslim community in India. Depending on their economic and political interests, most are neutral or silent on the plight of Muslims in India.

Muslims who were once the voice of justice worldwide are now feeble to defend their vulnerable? As a result, they are an easy target for the perpetrators of injustice.

Muslims generally blame their irreligious practices for their plight. They believe that their conditions will improve once they become punctual in observing five essential pillars and commit Quran to their memory after learning to read it with proper pronunciation. Ninety-five percent of the discourses of their scholars and learned people focus on these two aspects. Yet conditions do not improve.

The secret of Muslims’ success in the past was their unfailing commitment to justice and human dignity. Wherever they found injustice against anyone, they were the first to raise their voices and take action regardless of the consequences. Moreover, they were not selective in choosing a community, race, or ethnicity for their stand.

Justice was practical to them. It meant standing for those done wrong. Furthermore, before they applied justice in their social life, they practiced it in their personal and family life.

Muslims today lack the commitment to justice in their social and personal lives. Instead, they have prejudices based on their race, culture, language, and religious faction. The prevalence of illiteracy and hunger among Muslims provides testimonies of their apathy toward each other.

Others know that the Muslim world does not care for each other or justice. They do not care about Muslim voices and reactions because there is none. The utter silence of the Muslim world on the ongoing genocidal attempts against Muslims encourages the fascists in India and elsewhere to continue pursuing their atrocities.

A few examples are worth noticing:

1. Despite their claims to stand for Muslim interests, Pakistan and Saudi Arabia endorsed communist China’s ongoing discriminatory policies against Uighur Muslims.

2. The Gulf countries, and the Palestinian Authority in the West Bank, conferred the highest civilian award to the Indian Prime Minister Modi, knowing his involvement in the massacre of Muslims in Gujarat in 2002.

3. Maldive’s government offered political asylum to the deposed Sri Lankan ruler responsible for atrocities against Muslims in his country.

4. On the issue of Kashmir, the Muslim world is generally silent. Pakistan raises the case when it intends to pick a fight with India.

The Muslim world and scholarship may be significant in extolling the virtues of justice, but they fall short of concrete action. Their record of challenging injustices within their communities is dismal. Moreover, their apathy has led the world to believe that influential and affluent Muslims do not care about their weak and vulnerable.

This attitude severely affects Muslims in countries with a robust nationalist religious majority. The situation in India and Myanmar is dangerous for Muslim minorities. The possibility of genocide is a reality, and any indifference would bring disaster sooner than later.

How should Muslim communities facing these challenges deal with the situation? Relying on the Muslim world would not help. Each community has to strengthen itself internally to face the danger. It would require a reassessment of the situation in each country by the national leadership. However, it seems a daunting task at present.