ISLAMABAD: A flurry of activity of Monday provided hope that the Pak-US marriage of convenience was not over despite the recent bellowing and booming of the Pakistani leadership.
U.S. Senator John Kerry (D-MA) (L) meets with Pakistanâ€™s PM Yusuf Raza Gilani at the prime ministerâ€™s residence in Islamabad May 16, 2011.
By the end of Senator John Kerryâ€™s day-long stay in Islamabad it appeared that the US had convinced Pakistan to undertake several steps for proving its commitment to the fight against terrorism. These included returning the wreckage of the helicopter which had malfunctioned during the May 2 raid in Abbotabad and eliminating terrorist sanctuaries in tribal areas.
In exchange Washington has committed itself to a process, which if successful, will lead to Secretary of State Hillary Clintonâ€™s visit to Islamabad for reviving the strategic dialogue which has been stalled since the arrest of CIA operative Raymond Davis and subsequent events such as drone attacks and the unilateral US operation killing Al Qaeda chief Osama Bin Laden.
John Kerry, who heads the US Senate Foreign Relations Committee, extracted these promises from the Pakistani leadership; he warned them that â€œif the relationship is to fall apart â€¦. US will always reserve the right to protect its national securityâ€.
Senator Kerryâ€™s tough love message was reinforced, Dawn has learnt, by the telephone calls Secretary Clinton made to President Asif Ali Zardari and Prime Minister Yousuf Raza Gilani.
Ms Clinton rang up Mr Gilani when he, the president and Chief of the Army Staff General Ashfaq Parvez Kayani were meeting Senator Kerry. The call is reported to have lasted about 20 minutes.
The secretary of state had called Mr Zardari on Sunday.
â€œI think we made serious progress. Pakistan has agreed to do a number of things immediately to demonstrate its further seriousness of purpose and we agreed to have several officials from the US to come here in the middle of the week or sometime soon to carry on this discussion and prepare the ground for Secretary Clinton,â€ a visibly fatigued Kerry told a selected group of journalists after his meetings with Pakistani civil and military leaders.
Having met the army chief on Sunday night, Mr Kerry spent most of Monday in meetings. As he noted: â€œWe worked harder today to talk about ways in which we can be better partners, work cooperatively and open doors to joint cooperation to fight terrorism.â€
Senator Kerry met President Zardari, Prime Minister Gilani and Army Chief Gen Kayani, individually and collectively, before a joint declaration was issued by the two sides expressing the willingness to carry on with their relationship.
Senator Kerry avoided divulging details of the steps agreed upon, but vaguely described it as including cooperation on counter-terrorism, intelligence sharing and targeting terrorist sanctuaries. The latter is hardly surprising; having been high on the American wish list for a long time, action against the havens in tribal areas was one of the major demands Mr Kerry brought to Islamabad.
He said: â€œWe need Pakistanâ€™s cooperation, we need Pakistanâ€™s help against sanctuaries in this country from where people are destabilising Afghanistan and frankly killing â€¦ all of (those who) are trying to provide for a stable Afghanistan.â€
However, he stopped of claiming that Pakistani leaders had agreed to go after the Haqqani network, one of the core contentious issues in the rocky bilateral ties. He was only willing to say cryptically that both countries had agreed to target â€œsome entity, which is engaged in terrorism â€¦ the entity that needs to be taken on one way or the otherâ€.
He also said that other measures to be taken by Pakistan included returning the tail of the helicopter which was left behind by the Navy Seals during the Abbotabad raid.
After it malfunctioned, the Americans exploded the helicopter before they left; this was done, it was reported, to prevent the stealth technology from falling into Pakistani, and possibly other, hands. However, distrust is still not a thing of the past. Despite Pakistanâ€™s new commitments, which Mr Kerry himself described as â€œmore detailed, more precise and clarifiedâ€, he made it clear that Washington was no longer going to be satisfied by mere promises.
â€œThis road ahead will not be defined by words. It will be defined by actions,â€ he told journalists.
This is why Washington is going to follow a step-by-step approach before confirming that Secretary Clinton will be taking a flight to Islamabad.
Two US officials â€” Special Envoy for Afghanistan and Pakistan Marc Grossman and CIA Deputy Director Mark Morrel â€” will visit Islamabad to follow up on Mr Kerryâ€™s talks and discuss the agreed measures in details and possibly gauge progress on the commitments made to the senator.
Secretary Clintonâ€™s visit remains contingent on the outcome of Grossmanâ€™s discussions. â€œFirst a meeting will take place to try to lay the groundwork for that (Clintonâ€™s meeting) and coming out of that meeting the secretary would set the date,â€ Senator Kerry said. However, in the midst of all the tough talk and the conditions he set, Mr Kerry also made an effort to soothe ruffled feathers, â€œwe are committed to working together with Pakistan â€” not unilaterally, but together in joint effortsâ€ â€” contingent once again on Pakistani cooperation.
â€œBut, if we are cooperating and working together there is no reason (for acting unilaterally),â€ he said.