An American Bribe That Stinks Of Appeasement By Robert Fisk In any other country, the current American bribe to Israel, and the latterâ€™s reluctance to accept it, in return for even a temporary end to the theft of somebody elseâ€™s property would be regarded as preposterous. Three billion dollarsâ€™ worth of fighter bombers in return for a temporary freeze in West Bank colonisation for a mere 90 days? Not including East Jerusalem so goodbye to the last chance of the east of the holy city for a Palestinian capital and, if Benjamin Netanyahu so wishes, a rip-roaring continuation of settlement on Arab land. In the ordinary sane world in which we think we live, there is only one word for Barack Obamaâ€™s offer: appeasement. Usually, our lords and masters use that word with disdain and disgust. Anyone who panders to injustice by one people against another people is called an appeaser. Anyone who prefers peace at any price, let alone a $3bn bribe to the guilty party is an appeaser. Anyone who will not risk the consequences of standing up for international morality against territorial greed is an appeaser. Those of us who did not want to invade Afghanistan were condemned as appeasers. Those of us who did not want to invade Iraq were vilified as appeasers. Yet that is precisely what Obama has done in his pathetic, unbelievable effort to plead with Netanyahu for just 90 days of submission to international law. Obama is an appeaser. The fact that the West and its political and journalistic elites I include the ever more disreputable New York Times take this tomfoolery at face value, as if it can seriously be regarded as another â€œstepâ€ in the â€œpeace processâ€, to put this mystical nonsense â€œback on trackâ€, is a measure of the degree to which we have taken leave of our senses in the Middle East. It is a sign of just how far America (and, through our failure to condemn this insanity, Europe) has allowed its fear of Israel and how far Obama has allowed his fear of Israeli supporters in Congress and the Senate to go. Three billion dollars for three months is one billion dollars a month to stop Israelâ€™s colonisation. Thatâ€™s half a billion dollars a fortnight. Thatâ€™s $500m a week. Thatâ€™s $71,428,571 a day, or $2,976,190 an hour, or $49,603 a minute. And as well as this pot of gold, Washington will continue to veto any resolutions critical of Israel in the UN and prevent â€œPalestineâ€ from declaring itself a state. Itâ€™s worth invading anyone to get that much cash to stage a military withdrawal, let alone the gracious gesture of not building more illegal colonies for only 90 days while furiously continuing illegal construction in Jerusalem at the same time. The Hillary Clinton version of this grotesquerie would be funny if it was not tragic. According to the sharp pen of the NYTâ€™s Roger Cohen, La Clinton has convinced herself that Palestine is â€œachievable, inevitable and compatible with Israelâ€™s securityâ€. And what persuaded Madame Hillary of this? Why, on a trip to the pseudo-Palestine â€œcapitalâ€ of Ramallah last year, she saw the Jewish settlements â€œthe brutality of it was so starkâ€ according to one of her officials but thought her motorcade was being guarded by the Israeli army because â€œtheyâ€™re so professionalâ€. And then, lo and behold, they turned out to be a Palestinian military guard, a â€œprofessional outfitâ€ and all this changed Madameâ€™s views! Quite apart from the fact that the Israeli army is a rabble, and that indeed, the Palestinians are a rabble too, this â€œroad to Ramallahâ€ incident led supporters of Madame, according to Cohen, to realise that there had been a transition â€œfrom a self-pitying, self-dramatising Palestinian psyche, with all the cloying accoutrements of victimhood, to a self-affirming culture of pragmatism and institution-buildingâ€. Palestinian â€œprime ministerâ€ Salam Fayyad, educated in the US so, naturally, a safe pair of hands, has put â€œgrowth before grumbling, roads before ranting, and security before everythingâ€. Having been occupied by a brutal army for 43 years, those wretched, dispossessed Palestinians, along with their cousins in the West Bank who have been homeless for 62 years, have at last stopped ranting and grumbling and feeling sorry for themselves and generally play-acting in order to honour the only thing that matters. Not justice. Certainly not democracy, but to the one God which Christians, Jews and Muslims are all now supposed to worship: security. Yes, they have joined the true brotherhood of mankind. Israel will be safe at last. That this infantile narrative now drives the woman who told us 11 years ago that Jerusalem was â€œthe eternal and indivisible capital of Israelâ€ proves that the Israeli-Palestinian conflict has now reached its apogee, its most treacherous and final moment. And if Netanyahu has any sense Iâ€™m talking abut the Zionist, expansionist kind he will wait out the 90 days, then thumb his nose at the US. In the three months of â€œgood behaviourâ€, of course, the Palestinians will have to bite the bullet and sit down to â€œpeaceâ€ talks which will decide the future borders of Israel and â€œPalestineâ€. But since Israel controls 62 per cent of the West Bank this leaves Fayyad and his chums about 10.9 per cent of mandate Palestine to argue about. And at the cost of $827 a second, theyâ€™d better do some quick grovelling. They will. We should all hang our heads in shame. But we wonâ€™t. Itâ€™s not about people. Itâ€™s about presentation. Itâ€™s not about justice. Itâ€™s about â€œsecurityâ€. And cash. Lots of it. Goodbye Palestine. The Independent 12-48 November 24, 2010 by TMO 0 comments 1 viewon *The Muslim Observer, 12-48, International, Opinion, Volume 12 Share this post Facebook Twitter Google plus Pinterest Linkedin Mail this article Print this article Next: Saudi Ruler Urges Muslims of the World to Bury Differences Previous: Hands Off, TSA!