Stealing the Arab Spring By Aijaz Zaka Syed Well, it was too good to last, I guess. The dream of a democratic Middle East has run into the stony wall of reality, if not totally shattered. After a dream run that has seen four of the most powerful men plucked out of their mighty citadels even as they desperately fought back to hang on in there at any price, the Arab spring seems to be encountering some real rough weather and nasty storms. One year on, the diabolic doctor in Damascus is trying hard to outshine his late father in spreading sweetness and light as an uncaring, indifferent world stands and stares. Things havenâ€™t been going smooth in Tunisia and Libya either, with the Islamists, the new leaders, facing off the remnants of the old order. However, it is Egypt, the land where it all began, which remains the centre-stage of this all-out battle between the old and the new. The sweeping measures taken with characteristic stealth over the past few days by the Generals, who effortlessly stepped into the chaotic void left behind by Mubarakâ€™s departure, portraying themselves as selfless guardians of the republic and the revolution, have sparked fears that the junta has stolen the Arab spring. A tumultuous week of the militaryâ€™s machinations has wiped away most of the democratic gains made in the past one year, underscoring the malevolent power of what some Egyptian analysts choose to describe as the â€œdeep state,â€ a term once reserved for Turkeyâ€™s shadowy elites holding back the countryâ€™s democratic aspirations and Islamic soul. No one expected Egyptâ€™s generals, who have directly or indirectly ruled the country for six decades to happily fade away into the night after transferring power to a civilian dispensation, thank you very much! There had always been apprehensions of a power grab by the men in khaki even at the height of the Tahrir Square agitation. The young and restless of Egypt and even the more seasoned Islamists, however, decided to keep their peace and give the military a chance in the interest of a smooth and peaceful transition from dictatorship to democracy. With stars in their eyes and fond hopes in their hearts, Egyptâ€™s naÃ¯ve revolutionaries trusted the military with the future of their revolution and that of their nation. They went home in the confidence that the military had changed with the rest of the country and would act in the national interest. The men in khaki, however, have always had only one overriding interest-their own. And their interest lies in the perpetuation of the status quo-the tyranny and all-round corruption that have been eating into Egyptâ€™s vitals all these years. So even as a triumphant Muslim Brotherhood was claiming victory in the presidential elections this week, the generals unveiled a new Constitutional Declaration at a press conference granting themselves sweeping powers and clipping the wings of the incoming president. For starters, the new president will have no power and control over the army. He will also have no power over parliament which has already been scrapped only five months after it came into being. Indeed, the new president will have little power over anything beyond the walls of the presidency. On the other hand, the self-appointed military council will have total control over all legislation and virtually all arms of the state. Yet the junta insists that itâ€™s not interested in keeping power and will transfer it to a civilian government by the month end. On Thursday, two days before the presidential run-off, the military had the Supreme Constitutional Court dissolve the parliament elected in the first credible polls held after Mubarak. The Muslim Brotherhood had swept the elections, taking control of the parliament and setting the cat among the pigeons. For good measure, the military council headed by Gen Hussain Tantawi, Mubarakâ€™s long-time friend and defence minister, also suggests that the new president elected after such fanfare could very well be for a short term as a new constitution, being drafted under the watchful eyes of the army, would demand a new president! So thatâ€™s that. Egypt is back to square one â€“ or so it seems. Having enjoyed unlimited, unquestionable powers all these years and controlling more than 30 percent of the economy, the military cannot countenance conceding its control over the levers of power. A Brotherhood takeover of the presidency, after its capture of parliament, is the ultimate nightmare for the generals and their patrons in the West. An assertive and independent president could put an end to the long decades of abuse of power and institutions, besides making the army accountable to the Egyptians, not foreign masters. Sixty years ago when Gen Mohammed Neguib went to see off King Farouk on the royal yacht after deposing him in a bloodless coup, the monarch had a word of advice to the new leader. â€œTake good care of the army,â€ said the king known for his love of good life. â€œYou know, itâ€™s not easy to govern Egypt.â€ Neguib, who along with his comrade in arms, Gamal Abdel Nasser, led the first post-War revolution, replied: â€œDonâ€™t worry. The army and Egypt are in good hands.â€ And Egypt has remained in the good hands of the generals since. The Egyptians and many around the world thought that things had changed with the Tahrir revolution. But clearly the more things change in Egypt, the more they remain the same. So Egypt may at last have a new democratically elected leader but he will be little more than a puppet in the hands of the military council. As had been the case for decades in Turkey, the military establishment with its numerous arms, security agencies and vested interests will continue to call the shots, no matter who is chosen by the people of Egypt. If this isnâ€™t a mockery of peopleâ€™s choice and their epic sacrifices offered all these years, especially over the past year, what is? Egypt is at a tipping point. The generals are playing a dangerous game which could have disastrous consequences not just for the country but the whole region, considering the pivotal nature of Egypt in the Arab world. If the Egyptians have to make a fresh start as a nation and rediscover their pride of place, the army will have to return to the barracks. They didnâ€™t challenge Mubarakâ€™s rule only to be saddled with the junta. The people have spoken and everyone must defer to their verdict. Else those who threw out the last pharaoh are capable of dealing with his courtiers too. Where does the West stand in all this? This week, warning the generals against a power grab, Secretary Hillary Clinton said: â€œThereâ€™s no going back in Egypt!â€ Letâ€™s hope Washington practices what it preaches. Itâ€™s hardly a secret who pampered and protected the regime in Egypt and, for that matter, elsewhere in the neighbourhood all these years. You donâ€™t have to look too far to see the consequences of messing with peopleâ€™s choices. The civil war in Algeria that broke out following the stealing of peopleâ€™s mandate in 1991 polls claimed nearly 200,000 lives. Egyptâ€™s generals cannot be allowed to steal the Arab spring. The write is a Gulf-based commentator. Email: aijaz.syed@hotmail. com 14-27 June 28, 2012 by TMO 0 comments 3 viewson *The Muslim Observer, 14-27, Opinion, Volume 14 Share this post Facebook Twitter Google plus Pinterest Linkedin Mail this article Print this article Next: Islam and Contemporary Muslims: The Age of Ayesha (ra) at the Time of Her Marriage Previous: Was Israel Premeditated?