A UN human rights investigator has likened Israelâ€™s occupation of the Palestinian territories to apartheid South Africa and says there should be â€œserious considerationâ€ over bringing the occupation to the international court of justice.
The report by John Dugard, a South African law professor who is the UNâ€™s special rapporteur on human rights in the Palestinian territories, represents some of the most forceful criticism yet of Israelâ€™s 40-year occupation.
Prof Dugard said although Israel and apartheid South Africa were different regimes, â€œIsraelâ€™s laws and practices in the OPT [occupied Palestinian territories] certainly resemble aspects of apartheid.â€ His comments are in an advance version of a report on the UN Human Rights Councilâ€™s website ahead of its session next month.
After describing the situation for Palestinians in the West Bank, with closed zones, demolitions and preference given to settlers on roads, with building rights and by the army, he said: â€œCan it seriously be denied that the purpose of such action is to establish and maintain domination by one racial group (Jews) over another racial group (Palestinians) and systematically oppressing them? Israel denies that this is its intention or purpose. But such an intention or purpose may be inferred from the actions described in this report.â€
He dismissed Israelâ€™s argument that the sole purpose of the vast concrete and steel West Bank barrier is for security. â€œIt has become abundantly clear that the wall and checkpoints are principally aimed at advancing the safety, convenience and comfort of settlers,â€ he said.
Gaza remained under occupation despite the withdrawal of settlers in 2005. â€œIn effect, following Israelâ€™s withdrawal, Gaza became a sealed-off, imprisoned and occupied territory,â€ he said.
Prof Dugard said his mandate was solely to report on human rights in the occupied Palestinian territories and he described as a violation of international humanitarian law the firing of rockets by Palestinians from Gaza into Israel. â€œSuch actions cannot be condoned and clearly constitute a war crime,â€ he said. â€œNevertheless, Israelâ€™s response has been grossly disproportionate and indiscriminate and resulted in the commission of multiple war crimes.â€