FBI whistle-blower Sibel Edmonds was described as â€œthe most gagged person in the history of the United Statesâ€ by the American Civil Liberties Union. Was the Sunday Times pressured to drop its investigation into her revelations?
By Nafeez Mosaddeq Ahmed
In a recent book Classified Woman, Sibel Edmonds, a former translator for the FBI, describes how the Pentagon, CIA and State Department maintained intimate ties to al-Qaeda militants as late as 2001.
A whistleblower has revealed extraordinary information on the U.S. governmentâ€™s support for international terrorist networks and organised crime. The government has denied the allegations yet gone to extraordinary lengths to silence her. Her critics have derided her as a fabulist and fabricator. But now comes word that some of her most serious allegations were confirmed by a major European newspaper only to be squashed at the request of the U.S. government.
In a recent book Classified Woman, Sibel Edmonds, a former translator for the FBI, describes how the Pentagon, CIA and State Department maintained intimate ties to al-Qaeda militants as late as 2001. Her memoir, Classified Woman: The Sibel Edmonds Story, published last year, charged senior government officials with negligence, corruption and collaboration with al Qaeda in illegal arms smuggling and drugs trafficking in Central Asia.
In interviews with this author in early March, Edmonds claimed that Ayman al-Zawahiri, current head of al Qaeda and Osama bin Ladenâ€™s deputy at the time, had innumerable, regular meetings at the U.S. embassy in Baku, Azerbaijan, with U.S. military and intelligence officials between 1997 and 2001, as part of an operation known as â€˜Gladio Bâ€™. Al-Zawahiri, she charged, as well as various members of the bin Laden family and other mujahideen, were transported on NATO planes to various parts of Central Asia and the Balkans to participate in Pentagon-backed destabilisation operations.
According to two Sunday Times journalists speaking on condition of anonymity, this and related revelations had been confirmed by senior Pentagon and MI6 officials as part of a four-part investigative series that were supposed to run in 2008. The Sunday Times journalists described how the story was inexplicably dropped under the pressure of undisclosed â€œinterest groupsâ€, which, they suggest, were associated with the U.S. State Department.
Described by the American Civil Liberties Union as the â€œmost gagged person in the history of the United States of America,â€ Edmonds studied criminal justice, psychology and public policy at George Washington and George Mason universities. Two weeks after the 9/11 terrorist attacks, her fluency in Turkish, Farsi and Azerbaijani earned her an FBI contract at the Washington DC field office. She was tasked with translating highly classified intelligence from operations against terrorism suspects in and outside the U.S.
In the course of her work, Edmonds became privy to evidence that U.S. military and intelligence agencies were collaborating with Islamist militants affiliated with al-Qaeda, the very forces blamed for the 9/11 attacks â€“ and that officials in the FBI were covering up the evidence. When Edmonds complained to her superiors, her family was threatened by one of the subjects of her complaint, and she was fired. Her accusations of espionage against her FBI colleagues were eventually investigated by the Justice Departmentâ€™s Office of the Inspector General, which did not give details about the allegations as they remained classified.
Although no final conclusions about the espionage allegations were reached, the Justice Department concluded that many of Edmondsâ€™ accusations â€œwere supported, that the FBI did not take them seriously enough and that her allegations were, in fact, the most significant factor in the FBIâ€™s decision to terminate her services.â€
When she attempted to go public with her story in 2002, and again in 2004, the U.S. government silenced Edmonds by invoking a legal precedent known as â€œstate secrets privilegeâ€ â€“ a near limitless power to quash a lawsuit based solely on the governmentâ€™s claim that evidence or testimony could divulge information that might undermine â€œnational security.â€ Under this doctrine, the government sought to retroactively classify basic information concerning Edmondsâ€™s case already in the public record, including, according to the New York Times, â€œwhat languages Ms. Edmonds translated, what types of cases she handled, and what employees she worked with, officials said. Even routine and widely disseminated information â€” like where she worked â€” is now classified.â€
Although certainly not the first invocation of â€œstate secrets privilegeâ€, since the Edmonds case the precedent has been used repeatedly in the post-9/11 era under both the Bush and Obama administrations to shield the U.S. government from court scrutiny of rendition, torture, warrantless wiretapping, as well as the Presidentâ€™s claimed war powers.
Other intelligence experts agree that Edmonds had stumbled upon a criminal conspiracy at the heart of the American judicial system. In her memoirs, she recounts that FBI Special Agent Gilbert Graham, who also worked in the Washington field office on counter-intelligence operations, told her over a coffee how he â€œran background checks on federal judgesâ€ in the â€œearly nineties for the bureauâ€¦ If we came up with shit â€“ skeletons in their closets â€“ the Justice Department kept it in their pantry to be used against them in the future or to get them to do what they want in certain cases â€“ cases like yours.â€ A redacted version of Grahamâ€™s classified protected disclosure to the Justice Department regarding these allegations, released in 2007, refers to the FBIâ€™s â€œabuse of authorityâ€ by conducting illegal wiretapping to obtain information on U.S. public officials.
Five years ago, Edmonds revealed to the Sunday Times that an unidentified senior U.S. State Department official was on the payroll of Turkish agents in Washington, passing on nuclear and military secrets. â€œHe was aiding foreign operatives against U.S. interests by passing them highly classified information, not only from the State Department but also from the Pentagon, in exchange for money, position and political objectivesâ€, Edmonds told the paper. She reported coming across this information when listening to suppressed phone calls recorded by FBI surveillance, marked by her colleague Melek Can Dickerson as â€œnot pertinentâ€.
In the Sunday Times exposÃ©, Edmonds described a parallel organisation in Israel cooperating with the Turks on illegal weapons sales and technology transfers. Between them, Israel and Turkey operated a range of front companies incorporated in the U.S. with active â€œmoles in sensitive military and nuclear institutionsâ€, supported by U.S. officials, in order to sell secrets to the highest bidder. One of the buyers was Pakistanâ€™s Inter Services Intelligence (ISI) â€“ which often used its Turkish allies, according to the Times, â€œas a conduitâ€¦ because they were less likely to attract suspicion.â€
The Pakistani operation was, the paper reported, â€œled by General Mahmoud Ahmad, then the ISI chiefâ€ from 1999 to 2001, when the agency helped train, supply and coordinate the Afghan Taliban and gave sanctuary to their Arab allies brought together in the coalition named al-Qaeda. Ahmad, as the Times noted, â€œwas accused [by the FBI] of sanctioning a $100,000 wire payment to Mohammed Atta, one of the 9/11 hijackers, immediately before the attacks.â€
According to Indian intelligence officials, they had assisted the FBI in â€œtracing and establishingâ€ the financial trail between the General and the chief hijacker. The discovery was, they allege, the real reason behind the Generalâ€™s sudden retirement in October 2001. The Pakistani daily, The News, reported on 10th September 2001 that the ISI chief held several â€œmysterious meetings at the Pentagon and National Security Councilâ€ that week, including with CIA director George Tenet.
In an interview with this author in March, Edmonds raised the question of whether U.S. officialsâ€™ liaisons with an espionage network overseen by Ahmad, and the FBIâ€™s suppression of related intelligence, played a role in facilitating the attacks.
â€œFollowing 9/11, a number of the foreign operatives were taken in for questioning by the FBI on suspicion that they knew about or somehow aided the attacksâ€, reported the Sunday Times. The paper related that according to Edmonds, the senior State Department official received a call from a foreign agent under FBI surveillance asking for help to â€œget them out of the U.S. because we canâ€™t afford for them to spill the beans.â€ The official promised â€œhe would â€˜take care of itâ€™.â€
Edmonds told this author that high-level corruption compromised the ability of the U.S. intelligence community to pursue ongoing investigations of those planning the 9/11 attacks. â€œIt was precisely those militants that were incubated by some of Americaâ€™s key alliesâ€, she said. Corruption helped guarantee Congressional silence when that incubation strategy backfired in the form of 9/11. â€œBoth Republican and Democratic representatives in the House and Senate came up in FBI counterintelligence investigations for taking bribes from foreign agentsâ€, she said.
Al-Qaeda: Enemy or Asset?
In her interview, Edmonds insisted that after its initial exposÃ©, the Timesâ€˜ investigation had gone beyond such previous revelations, and was preparing to disclose her most startling accusations. Among these, Edmonds described how the CIA and the Pentagon had been running a series of covert operations supporting Islamist militant networks linked to Osama bin Laden right up to 9/11, in Central Asia, the Balkans and the Caucasus.
While it is widely recognised that the CIA sponsored bin Ladenâ€™s networks in Afghanistan during the Cold War, U.S. government officials deny any such ties existed. Others claim these ties were real, but were severed after the Soviet Union collapsed in 1989.
But according to Edmonds, this narrative is false. â€œNot just bin Laden, but several senior â€˜bin Ladensâ€™ were transported by U.S. intelligence back and forth to the region in the late 1990s through to 2001â€³, she told this author, â€œincluding Ayman al-Zawahiriâ€ â€“ Osama bin Ladenâ€™s right-hand-man who has taken over as al-Qaedaâ€™s top leader.
â€œIn the late 1990s, all the way up to 9/11, al-Zawahiri and other mujahideen operatives were meeting regularly with senior U.S. officials in the U.S. embassy in Baku to plan the Pentagonâ€™s Balkan operations with the mujahideen,â€ said Edmonds. â€œWe had support for these operations from Pakistan and Saudi Arabia, but the U.S. oversaw and directed them. They were being run from a secret section of the Pentagon with its own officeâ€.
Edmonds clarified, â€œthe FBI counterintelligence investigation which was tracking these targets, along with their links to U.S. officials, was known as â€˜Gladio Bâ€™, and was kickstarted in 1997. It so happens that Major Douglas Dickersonâ€ â€“ the husband of her FBI co-worker Melek whom she accused of espionage â€“ â€œspecifically directed the Pentagonâ€™s â€˜Gladioâ€™ operations in Kazakhstan and Turkmenistan at this time.â€
In testimony under oath, Edmonds has previously confirmed that Major Doug Dickerson worked for the Pentagonâ€™s Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) under the weapons procurement logistics division on Turkey and Central Asia, and with the Office of Special Plans (OSP) overseeing policy in Central Asia.
Edmonds said that the Pentagon operations with Islamists were an â€œextensionâ€ of an original â€˜Gladioâ€™ programme uncovered in the 1970s in Italy, part of an EU-wide NATO covert operation that began as early as the 1940s. As Swiss historian Dr. Daniele Ganser records in his seminal book, NATOâ€™s Secret Armies, an official Italian parliamentary inquiry confirmed that British MI6 and the CIA had established a network of secret â€œstay-behindâ€ paramilitary armies, staffed by fascist and Nazi collaborators. The covert armies carried out terrorist attacks throughout Western Europe, officially blamed on Communists in what Italian military intelligence called the â€˜strategy of tensionâ€™.
â€œYou had to attack civilians, the people, women, children, innocent people, unknown people far removed from any political gameâ€ explained Gladio operative Vincenzo Vinciguerra during his trial in 1984. â€œThe reason was quite simple. They were supposed to force these peopleâ€¦ to turn to the State to ask for greater security.â€
While the reality of Gladioâ€™s existence in Europe is a matter of historical record, Edmonds contended the same strategy was adopted by the Pentagon in the 1990s in a new theatre of operations, namely, Asia. â€œInstead of using neo-Nazis, they used mujahideen working under various bin Ladens, as well as al-Zawahiriâ€, she said.
The last publicly known Gladio meeting occurred in NATOâ€™s Allied Clandestine Committee (ACC) in Brussels in 1990. While Italy was a focal point for the older European operations, Edmonds said that Turkey and Azerbaijan served as the main conduits for a completely new, different set of operations in Asia using veterans of the anti-Soviet campaign in Afghanistan, the so-called â€œAfghan Arabsâ€ that had been trained by al-Qaeda.
These new Pentagon-led operations were codenamed â€˜Gladio Bâ€™ by FBI counterintelligence: â€œIn 1997, NATO asked [Egyptian President] Hosni Mubarak to release from prison Islamist militants affiliated to Ayman al-Zawahiri [whose role in the assassination of Anwar Sadat led to Mubarakâ€™s ascension]. They were flown under U.S. orders to Turkey for [training and use in] operations by the Pentagonâ€, she said.
Edmondsâ€™ allegations find some independent corroboration in the public record. The Wall Street Journal refers to a nebulous agreement between Mubarak and â€œthe operational wing of Egyptian Islamic Jihad, which was then headed by Ayman al-Zawahiriâ€¦ Many of that groupâ€™s fighters embraced a cease-fire with the government of former President Hosni Mubarak in 1997.â€
Youssef Bodansky, former Director of the Congressional Task Force on Terrorism and Unconventional Warfare, cited U.S. intelligence sources in an article for Defense and Foreign Affairs: Strategic Policy, confirming â€œdiscussions between the Egyptian terrorist leader Dr. Ayman al-Zawahiri and an Arab-American known to have been both an emissary of the CIA and the U.S. Government.â€ He referred to an â€œofferâ€ made to al-Zawahiri in November 1997 on behalf of U.S. intelligence, granting his Islamists a free hand in Egypt as long as they lent support to U.S. forces in the Balkans. In 1998, Al Zawahiriâ€™s brother, Muhammed, led an elite unit of the Kosovo Liberation Army against Serbs during the Kosovo conflict â€“ he reportedly had direct contact with NATO leadership.
â€œThis is whyâ€, Edmonds continued in her interview, â€œeven though the FBI routinely monitored the communications of the diplomatic arms of all countries, only four countries were exempt from this protocol â€“ the UK, Turkey, Azerbaijan, and Belgium â€“ the seat of NATO. No other country â€“ not even allies like Israel or Saudi Arabia, were exempt. This is because these four countries were integral to the Pentagonâ€™s so-called Gladio B operations.â€
Edmonds did not speculate on the objectives of the Pentagonâ€™s â€˜Gladio Bâ€™ operations, but highlighted the following possibilities: projecting U.S. power in the former Soviet sphere of influence to access previously untapped strategic energy and mineral reserves for U.S. and European companies; pushing back Russian and Chinese power; and expanding the scope of lucrative criminal activities, particularly illegal arms and drugs trafficking.
Terrorism finance expert Loretta Napoleoni estimates the total value of this criminal economy to be about $1.5 trillion annually, the bulk of which â€œflows into Western economies, where it gets recycled in the U.S. and in Europeâ€ as a â€œvital element of the cash flow of these economies.â€
It is no coincidence then that the opium trade, Edmonds told this author, has grown rapidly under the tutelage of NATO in Afghanistan: â€œI know for a fact that NATO planes routinely shipped heroin to Belgium, where they then made their way into Europe and to the UK. They also shipped heroin to distribution centres in Chicago and New Jersey. FBI counterintelligence and DEA (Drug Enforcement Agency) operations had acquired evidence of this drug trafficking in its surveillance of a wide range of targets, including senior officials in the Pentagon, CIA and State Department. As part of this surveillance, the role of the Dickersons â€“ with the support of these senior U.S. officials â€“ in facilitating drug-trafficking, came up. It was clear from this evidence that the whole funnel of drugs, money and terror in Central Asia was directed by these officials.â€
The evidence for this funnel, according to Edmonds, remains classified in the form of FBI counterintelligence surveillance records she was asked to translate. Although this alleged evidence has never made it to court due to the U.S. governmentâ€™s exertion of â€˜state secret privilegeâ€™, she was able to testify in detail concerning her allegations, including naming names, in 2009.
In recent interviews, two Sunday Times journalists confirmed to this author that the newspaperâ€™s investigation based on Sibel Edmondsâ€™ revelations was to break much of the details into the open.
â€œWeâ€™d spoken to several current and active Pentagon officials confirming the existence of U.S. operations sponsoring mujahideen networks in Central Asia from the 1990s to 2001,â€ said oneSunday Times source. â€œThose mujahideen networks were intertwined with a whole range of criminal enterprises, including drugs and guns. The Pentagon officials corroborated Edmondsâ€™ allegations against specific U.S. officials, and Iâ€™d also interviewed an MI6 officer who confirmed that the U.S. was running these operations sponsoring mujahideen in that period.â€
But according to Edmonds, citing the investigative team at the paper, the last two articles in the series were spiked under U.S. State Department pressure. She recalled being told at the time by journalists leading the Sunday Times investigation that the newspaperâ€™s editor had decided to squash the story after receiving calls from officials at the U.S. embassy in London.
A journalist with the Sunday Timesâ€˜ investigative unit told this author he had interviewed former Special Agent in Charge, Dennis Saccher, who had moved to the FBIâ€™s Colorado office. Saccher reportedly confirmed the veracity of Edmondsâ€™ allegations of espionage, telling him that Edmondsâ€™ story â€œshould have been front page newsâ€ because it was â€œa scandal bigger than Watergate.â€ The same journalist confirmed that after interviewing Saccher at his home, the newspaper was contacted by the U.S. State Department. â€œThe U.S. embassy in London called the editor and tried to ward him off.â€
â€œWe were told that we werenâ€™t permitted to approach Saccher or any other active FBI agents directly, but could only go through the FBIâ€™s press office â€“ that if we tried to speak to Saccher or anyone else employed by the FBI directly, that would be illegal. Of course, it isnâ€™t, but thatâ€™s what we were told. I think this was a veiled threat.â€
Saccherâ€™s comments to the journalist never made it to press.
A lead reporter on the series at the Sunday Times told this author that the investigation based on Edmondsâ€™ information was supposed to have four parts, but was inexplicably dropped. â€œThe story was pulled half-way, suddenly, without any warningâ€, the journalist said. â€œI wasnâ€™t party to the editorial decision to drop the story, but there was a belief in the office amongst several journalists who were part of the Insight investigative unit that the decision was made under pressure from the U.S. State Department, because the story might cause a diplomatic incident.â€
Although the journalist was unaware of where this belief came from â€“ and was not informed of the U.S. embassyâ€™s contact with the paperâ€™s editor which the other journalist was privy to â€“ he acknowledged that self-censorship influenced by unspecified â€œinterest groupsâ€ was a possible explanation. â€œThe way the story was dropped was unusual, but the belief amongst my colleagues this happened under political pressure is plausible.â€ He cryptically described an â€œeditorial mechanism, linked to the paper but not formally part of it, which could however exert control on stories when necessary, linked to certain interests.â€ When asked which interests, the journalist said, â€œI canâ€™t say. I canâ€™t talk about that.â€
Edmonds described how, due to the U.S. governmentâ€™s efforts to silence her, she had no option left except to write her story down. The resultant book, Classified Woman, had to be submitted to an FBI panel for review. By law, the bureau was required to make a decision on what could be disclosed or redacted within 30 days.
Instead, about a year later, Edmondsâ€™ lawyer received a letter from the FBI informing them that the agency was still reviewing the book, and prohibiting her from publishing it: â€œThe matters Ms. Edmonds writes about involve many equities, some of which may implicate information that is classifiedâ€¦ Approval of the manuscripts by the FBI will include incorporation of all changes required by the FBI. Until then, Ms. Edmonds does not have approval to publish her manuscripts which includes showing them to editors, literary agents, publishers, reviewers, or anyone else. At this point, Ms. Edmonds remains obligated not to disclose or publish the manuscript in any manner.â€
The block was another example, Edmonds said, â€œof the abuse of â€˜national securityâ€™ to conceal evidence of criminality.â€ She said that this forced her to release the book herself in March 2012, as no publisher would risk taking it on.
Sibel Edmonds memoirs, Classified Woman: The Sibel Edmonds Story, is available from all good online booksellers.
Dr Nafeez Ahmed writes for The Guardian on the geopolitics of environmental, energy and economic crises at his Earth Insight blog. His personal website is www.nafeezahmed.com.